This behaviour by emptying the picture frame first (using: kid3-cli -c Running the command multiple times leads to multiple covers in a singleīecause I want to replace existing cover art, I tried to work around However if I use the sameĬommand on my Opus files, the newer art is added to existing art MP3, AAC, FLAC and Ogg Vorbis files, the selected art replaces existingĪrt. When using the kid3-cli 'set picture' command to add cover art to my Some unexpected behaviour when attempting to add cover art to Opus audio Immeasurably easier across both Windows and Linux. Z did not need strange costumes, though a fez suited him quite nicely.First, thanks for an excellent program. Zucco's weird vibe is nearer to Lorre's, without Peter's libidinous qualities, in his being weird unto himself because he's Zucco, without frills, as it were. My heart is more with Zucco, though, who strikes me as better embodying weirdness his name is a plus, as good as Karloff's in that department. He was simply a better known player than Zucco overall, and many moviegoers and, especially horror fans, liked him. I'm a huge fan of Lionel Atwill, who had a secure niche as a mad doctor in many horrors, a distinction she shared with George Zucco, though if I had to choose just one, Atwill it would be, from a rational perspective. Yes, he did other things, but he’s mostly associated with the horror genre and is always a welcome presence.Ģ:47 PM - Feb 26I wasn’t thinking silent era but if included, yes, agreed Chaney, Sr, would take the fourth spot, easily. He got his monster magazine cover moment in MYSTERY OF THE WAX MUSEUM and was a regular in the genre from the early thirties to the mid forties, giving him a consistency Lorre never had. Lionel Atwill: With much love for Zucco and Carradine, if at gunpoint I had to do a four, it’s Atwill. I dismiss the merits of Cy Young for similar reasons. Rondo Hatton: Why not? The only knock on him is he never won a Rondo award. Instead, he was wasted for the most part in bit parts, being relegated to one or two lines as a villager in a lot of his later work. After his turns as Renfield and Fritz, you’d think this guy would get bigger horror roles. So he even had his iconic make up job.įay Wray: She wasn’t a boogey man, but she made an iconic presence in KING KONG and appeared in a decent amount of genre films for a few years.Ĭolin Clive: A flame that burned out too quick, but his FRANKENSTEIN portrayal alone gives him consideration.ĭwight Frye: In a just world, he’d be number four. However, there’s no denying his turn in ISLAND OF LOST SOULS is more than worthy and while one can argue the horror merits of HUNCHBACK OF NOTRE DAME, Laughton wearing that make up belongs on the cover of any monster magazine. So infrequency is the issue, plus he did a lot of other things.Ĭharles Laughton: What, you say? I admit, the same problem with Lorre in the infrequency and even more so, more mainstream roles. In between, he was playing in mainstream roles or Mr. Very good roles, but there’s the rub - they were eleven years apart. MAD LOVE and THE BEAST WITH FIVE FINGERS are the two we can probably all agree on. M is arguable horror but no doubt has a memorable Lorre role. When AIP was doing the senior citizen boogeyman tour in the sixties, Lorre was invited. When there were boogeymen comedy films, he would be teamed with Karloff twice and once with Lugosi in two films. Peter Lorre: I think if we’re going by how they were marketed at the time, unquestionably Peter Lorre. My thoughts on certain arguments that can be made for some. I have a distant fourth but I like reading the perspective of you guys. I wasn’t thinking silent era but if included, yes, agreed Chaney, Sr, would take the fourth spot, easily.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |